Championship

After Derby fans’ faux-pas should some topics be off limit when it comes to football chants?

|

Although it’s been a long time since either club could claim to be amongst the biggest in the country, the rivalry between Nottingham Forest and Derby County has never faded.  They still hate each other, and games between the two are always lively and the fans are always up for it.  As with any rivalry, supporters from both sides have been known to sing and chant songs designed purely to wind up their opposing numbers, but on Tuesday night, Derby fans seemed to take this too far.

They chanted ‘Where’s your chairman gone?’ and ‘You’re going down with your chairman’, in reference to Nigel Doughty, the late Forest owner who died in February.  Forest fans were unsurprisingly angered by the chants, and Derby issued an apology the next day.  I learned about this story when I read that Forest striker Dexter Blackstock had tweeted his disgust at the chants, and I was surprised to see some people saying ‘That’s football’ on forums I use.  The same thing was said by some people in an effort to defend John Terry’s alleged racial abuse of Anton Ferdinand, the suggestion being that anything that happens on the pitch or in the ground during the 90 minutes of a football game is fine, because football apparently lives in an alternate reality where anything goes.

It’s a strange mentality, and one that is unique to football.  I can’t claim that I’ve never sworn at a referee or player, or joined in with songs that would offend the opposing fans, but there surely has to be a line that shouldn’t be crossed?

Football matches have a unique atmosphere in sports.  Fans can get creative when it comes to singing the praises of their team, manager or players, and there are a lot of clever and funny songs that do so.  But there’s an ugly side to chanting too.  When Manchester United travelled to Elland Road to face Leeds in the Carling Cup last September, Leeds fans chanted about the Munich disaster, while Man Utd fans chanted about Turkey, in reference to 2 Leeds fans murdered when Leeds travelled to Turkey for a Champions League tie.  Fans of various clubs have been chanting ‘We know what you are’ at players this season, most notably John Terry and Anton Ferdinand, and Patrice Evra and Luis Suarez, following allegations of racist remarks by Terry and Suarez aimed at Ferdinand and Evra.

The question is, why do some fans have an ‘anything goes’ attitude towards chants and songs at football matches?  The passion involved in watching your team play can lead to fans shouting things without thinking, but one off remarks are very different from regular chants or songs.  A lot of thought goes into these songs, and if they are offensive, it is because they are designed to be.  How did it become a part of the game though?  When did singing move away from being something used to support your team and spurring them on to victory, to being something to wind up opponents or opposing fans?

In recent years, fans have become more willing to report people who are making points a little too aggressively.  But it is supporters groups that come up with the more elaborate chants, and the question becomes, ‘How do you persuade them to stop?’  Although chants may be offensive, it’s often not the case that they are breaking any laws.  While it could be argued that Chelsea fans singing ‘Anton Ferdinand, we know what you are’ is a derogatory reference to the colour of his skin, it is difficult to prove it. 

The truth is that it may be up to supporters groups to govern themselves, and to move away from offensive chanting towards singing in support of their teams.  Some people will argue that such a move would hurt the atmosphere generated at games, but supporting your team should mean just that.  Purely singing in support of your own team would make football matches more attractive to families, and ensure that parents bring their children at a young age to encourage their support.

I know this is a plea that may fall on deaf ears, but there are some topics that should be off limits at football matches, and people that push those limits hurt the reputation of their clubs.

For more blogs, follow me on Twitter @DavidWDougan and @TheGlassCase

Introducing the neat little app that’ll pay you to view content tailored to your interests:

ThisisFutbol.com are seeking new writers to join the team! If you’re passionate about football, drop us a line at “thisisfutbol.com@snack-media.com” to learn more.

Share this article

0 comments

  • Mrs Christine Buchan says:

    I am a 62 year old Derby County fan and I agree what a small minority were singing is absolutely out of order but nobody has mentioned what started it. When Sean Barker was down injured the Forest fans were chanting let him die while he was being treated and then booed when he was carried off on a stretcher. In my opinion this was also our of order.

  • Charlie Cox says:

    I think you should at least of followed your findings up and carried out more research to find the under lying issues.
    1)This chant was carried out by a small section of Derby fans.
    2)Forest fans started the disgusting chants by singing ‘let him die’ to our injured club captain Shaun Barker, thus striking up the chant in question. (Forest started it).
    3)Derby issued a formal apoligy to the nation in regards to these select fans. To my knowledge no statement has been released by Nottingham Forest officials.
    4) Instead of focusing on the fact we beat Forest for the second time this season you have brushed over that with your non informal story which has missed the boat by almost 2 weeks.

  • Paul says:

    As a Leeds fan I agree with just about everything you say. I would just like to point out one error in your report however. On the day that you mention when Leeds played Man U it was the Man U fans arriving with banners about Turkey and singing their songs about our two lads who were murdered that started the tit for tat offensive chanting. I’m not for one second attempting to defend songs about Munich but I do get fed up that whenever these things are reported it’s always Leeds who are labelled as the instigators. Ask Liverpool fans about Man U and their songs about Hillsborough, they are a disgrace.

  • Tommy says:

    Hi,

    I agree totally that a minority of Derby fans did take it too far, but find myself increasingly frustrated that this has become one sided. A minority of Nottingham Forest fans were aiming chants at Shaun Barker saying “let him die” after his nasty injury, and yet people ignore the death threats and only look at the chants about a dead chairman. I am not saying I agree with either chant because both are disgusting but I wanted to point out that it was not one side chanting, but both sides sparking anger to each other causing those chants to happen.

  • Tasty Dave says:

    Also what is missed from the below is that the injured Derby Player (Out for a year with a fractured knee cap or similar) is from Nottingham, a Forest fan and his full family were at the ground too witnessing the chants about wanting him to die.
    This does not justify the louts from Derby who made did the stupid chanting but if the shoe was on the other foot it would have been exactly the same!

  • Timmy P says:

    I think our sheep bothering cousins are being a little selective with the truth here:

    Whilst in amongst the Forest Fans I heard no chants aimed at Shaun Barker. There may have been some, but will have been a handful of morons otherwise I would have heard it.
    The ‘small’ minority of scum that chanted about Nigel Doughty were very loud, so must have been in the thousands. I could see the whole corner section the the right of the away fans singing it, and there were other stands joining in. This chanting could be heard clearly on the BBC Radio Nottingham too as it was replayed on the news the following morning. You always get a few moronic scumbags who will sing vile, sick & racist songs. I’m ashamed to say that Forest have their fair share of them too. But the chanting at Derby was organised, with 4 different songs being sung by large chunks of the home support.

  • Ted says:

    Where was your similar article from a couple of years ago when Forest fans taunted the then Derby player Kris Commons over the recent death of his baby? Oh, that’s right, you didn’t write one. Nobody did. And did Forest apologise to Derby over that abuse? No, they didn’t. To paint Forest as victims in all this is absolute tosh.

  • Ilkleywhite says:

    Why are we back to this again?

    Are we back to the 1970s when this kind of thing went on all the time, and I don’t care who said what or who started what, it wrong, what next pitched battles in the stands?

    Songs that glorify tragedies in football are terrible, there is simply no excuse “that it is football related”, it is out of order, is there anywhere else in the entire World rather than a football ground where masses of people chant about people dying, people getting hurt or stabbed, and the colour of their skin, and laugh about it, as if it is a normal thing to do?

    It’s time people looked at themselves and stopped this foul mouthed and vile chanting, once and for all.

  • John says:

    Surely this cant be the same Forest fans who where chanting about Gary Speed to the Leeds fans

  • After exhaustive research it has been decided that the players, supporters and management of the Trees have been found to be suffering from ‘selective hearing’, apparently this impediment has been manifesting itself over a great number of years and is incurable.

  • Madamster says:

    …… not to mention the Kris Commons “baby” baiting shortly after his wife miscarried.

    …… not to mention the songs directed at the LUFC fans by those nice people from Trentside shortly after Gary Speed’s death.

    …… not to mention the Savage, where’s your dad? heard in and around the stadium last Tuesday.

    No way can, or will, I condone the Doughty chants. However, you Tree Huggers (fans, club, manager) should get off your high horses and accept that you also fail to come whiter than white out of this sorry issue.

    Yes, a section of the Derby crowd went OTT. DCFC has apologised. NFFC owes 4 apologies IMO, Commons, Speed’s family, Sav and Barker’s family. The latter must really have been a sickener to a man who is a lifelong Tree himself, whose family are also of the leafy persuasion and were present to hear the abuse…….

    Neither set of fans come out of this with any credit.

  • David Dougan says:

    In general response to some of the comments….

    I have not written about chants in previous matches between these clubs because I am not aware of them. It is only in the last year that I have started writing for this site, and I have not previously had my writing published anywhere. This is also the first time I have chosen to write about this topic.

    I could have listed many more examples of tasteless and provocative songs and chants from many clubs across the country, but that would have made for a pointless article. I am not a fan of Derby County or Nottingham Forest, and I wrote this article a few days after the incident, not ‘almost 2 weeks’ afterwards.

    It seems to me like the kind of chants mentioned in my article are on the rise, or maybe they are just being reported more often. Regardless, it’s not something I enjoy hearing at football matches, and I stand by everything I’ve said in the article.

  • Madamster says:

    David, don’t take offence. I think you will find that we Rams fans are on top of this as we feel that there is a lack of balance in the overall reporting and comment on what happened.

    That we would take stick (quite rightly) for the actions of a section of the crowd is a given and justified.

    In the same game NFFC fans were over the top as well. Nobody seems to be taking them to task.

    As I’ve said before, the chants were wrong. However, in reporting there should be balance and the actions of a section of the Trees have been completely ignored.

    Ignored by the press in general, by NFFC, by Cotterilll and on many, many fora. You too missed the balance in your article. I can understand NFFC wanting to deflect attention from having their biggest rivals doing the double over them but why do so many others lambast DCFC and not NFFC?

Comments are closed.