I have written repeatedly in the past about transfer fees, first commenting last summer on how ridiculous it was that so many people were comparing the transfer fees of James Milner to Manchester City and Mesut Ozil to Real Madrid when there were a number of extenuating circumstances. In January we got the same response of shock, horror and outrage at the fee for the transfer of Darren Bent from Sunderland to Aston Villa. Yet again people were all too keen to point out other transfer fees as some sort of proof that he was overpriced.
As I said at the time, every transfer is unique – so many factors come into play that decide what that fee is, that the actual skill of the player becomes the tip of the iceberg. And what is a market value for a player?
Well the fact is there isn’t one. There’s no manual available, no graphs to check to see what a player is worth, no complex formula – it is a figure that cannot be determined – what is the worth of a human being to a football club? Almost impossible to say. And there are other costs as well of course – wages, signing on fees, payments to agents and so on. The transfer fee is just the beginning, and it often includes add-ons that will only be paid if the player is successful anyway, plus sell-on clauses, image rights, and so much more.
The factors include:
Do the selling club need to sell?
Do the selling club want to sell?
Does the player want to leave?
How good is the player?
In what position does the player play?
What nationality is the player?
How long does he have left on his contract?
Are there a number of clubs after him?
Age
And that’s just some of the reasons. There are more– injury history, attitude, lifestyle – the player might have a release clause – as I said, every deal is unique.
But having also written recently about the “British premium” as Jordan Henderson and Phil Jones made big-money moves to Liverpool and Manchester United respectively, where I argued it is perhaps more of a premium on players with Premiership experience, not just British players, a new edict is looming on the horizon that perhaps explains further the purchases made by United and Liverpool, and which will heavily shape future transfer policies for clubs.
this was a great Blog !!
cheers !!
isn’t this 9 homegrown in each matchday squad the same principle as the 6+5… if so it will be rejected. Because of european employment laws the only way of having some kind of worthwhile quota on the numbers of foreign players / homegrown players in a squad is to have some universal unwritten rule which i cant see the big clubs agreeing too, particularly if the prices of British players become even more inflated….. but thats another debate for another day…. the ridiculous transfer fees as you rightly point out are down to lots of different factors but you must admit that the price of English players is way too high and they come at a premium because of our belief that english players are some of the best in the world. Its another example of english ignorance when it comes to our standing in the football world. for example… how much did Luis Suarez cost in comparison with Andy Carroll? Laughable, buy french and scandinavian, thats where the bargains are! lol