Supporters of Manchester City have been left unhappy with a transfer report over supposed interest in signing Tottenham Hotspur’s Harry Kane.
According to the Daily Express, Pep Guardiola’s outfit is set for a £150 million ‘tug of war’ with Real Madrid for the services of the English striker (via @City_Xtra), which supporters were unhappy about.
If Manchester City signed Harry Kane for £150 million in the next transfer window, would you be unhappy?Yes, he's not worth that
No, would be a good move
|
Harry Kane is at the centre of a £150M 'tug of war' between Real Madrid and Manchester City.
[@DExpress_Sport] pic.twitter.com/kHAn4yEG0t
— City Xtra (@City_Xtra) April 4, 2020
They can have him
— Sarah (@GrandiosoGarcia) April 4, 2020
exactly, we have two strikers who are better than him (Jesus has the potential to become a world beater) Aguero already is so what’s the point when we can spend that money on Skriniar or A Sane replacement if he leaves
— KunAgueroSZN (@aguero_szn) April 5, 2020
We shouldn’t waste money like that
— King KDB ???? (@ali_nw1) April 5, 2020
When Kane has featured for Spurs in the Premier League he has been the London club’s best-performing player with a solid 7.3/10 average rating (per WhoScored).
To earn the rating he has bagged an impressive 11 goals and two assists in 20 Premier League appearances (per WhoScored), however, City fans were still not interested.
I’ll drive him to @HeathrowAirport if it helps.??
— Matt Bailey (@beagleblueF1) April 4, 2020
There are better options than him
— Eeconic (@eeconic) April 4, 2020
Injury prone ! Not needed! have fun in Spain ??
— Phil Morris (@IndieBloke) April 4, 2020
why cant city wait for erling haaland
— Shawn (@Cityzenbybirth) April 4, 2020
What do we think?
Over the duration of his career, the 26-year-old striker has netted a whopping 136 goals and 24 assists in 201 Premier League games (per Transfermarkt), so, the supporters’ stance seems a little baffling.
However, Man City fans seem absolutely clear on their feelings towards the English striker and would not want to see the Manchester club attempt to pay £150 million for Kane.