Blogs

Why hasn’t more talent from the Academy made the Tottenham first team?

|
Image for Why hasn’t more talent from the Academy made the Tottenham first team?

There is a rare beast in North London, a creature seen so scarcely its very existence has been questioned. Its name is the Tottenham Hotspur home-grown player. First team sightings are so few they can be counted on the fingers of one hand in recent years.

We are not talking here about players who fit the new home-grown criteria set to be introduced for the next premiership season, players like Dawson, Huddlestone and Lennon for example. We are talking about products of the Academy, the Spurs youth setup, brought in as youngsters and turned into top quality, valuable players.

According to the Spurs website, their ethos is: ‘to recruit the best potential which can be developed by the best coaches, working in the best facilities..’ but the results have been pitiful. They currently have Ledley King and Peter Crouch (even though the latter failed to make an appearance for the club as a youngster) representing the academy, before that we are harking back to such club legends as Luke Young, Dean Marney and Jamie O’Hara. There is no haul here, no golden era, not even close to a steady trickle.

The failure of youth team players to make it into the first team has been a problem for the past 20 years, and whilst the current crop of youth players look highly promising, it will be interesting to see how many actually make it.

During Tottenham’s many years of disappointment, Arsenal, West Ham, Manchester City and Manchester United have all nurtured top premiership talents. The recent approach at Spurs lodge has been to buy this young talent, developed elsewhere, before it gets too expensive. Whilst this policy has proved successful with the likes of Huddlestone, Lennon and even Bale, it is an acknowledgement of the failure of the club’s own development programme and also a nod to the need for instant success at this level.

However, with the need for a new stadium looming, and the prospect of a severe belt tightening with it. The financial need of developing at least some home-grown talent will become apparent. Buying young players from other more successful academies to cover up the inadequacies of the youth programme is a short-term solution and an unsustainable one.

Harry Redknapp’s involvement at West Ham during the period in the 90’s that saw them bring through, Ferdinand, Cole, Lampard, Carrick and Defoe should encourage as surely he understands the importance of the youth system, but Spurs have a lot of catching up to do.

Written by Phillip Wroe for FootballFancast.com.

ThisisFutbol.com are seeking new writers to join the team! If you’re passionate about football, drop us a line at “thisisfutbol.com@snack-media.com” to learn more.

To have a peak at the top SEVEN available FREE TRANSFERS this summer, click here.

Or to have a look at 10 ways a football lover can spend this summer, click here!

Share this article

FFC

0 comments

  • Bob a lob says:

    Talking of sub standard coaching….
    Tottenhams stiker coaches. or is it just an unlucky coincidence we have FOUR guys that couldn’t do it last season?
    ahh, what do i know?!

  • JimB says:

    The truth is that, during the Sugar years, the youth set up was largely neglected.

    When ENIC took over, the priority was first to get the club back to a competitive level after more than a decade in the wilderness. Nevertheless, they also made big plans for the academy. That didn’t really take effect until 6-7 years ago, when Arnesen (and then Comolli) got to work on it.

    These things don’t happen overnight. It takes years to bring young players through the system. And we’re finally starting to see many more, much better quality players emerging from the academy. Players such as Caulker, Kane, Carroll, Townsend and Mason are the vanguard of the new breed. Not all of them will make it at Spurs. But they will all be good players. And there will be more to come – helped hugely by the move, next summer, to the new, vastly better, academy and training ground.

    So, yes, Spurs’ academy has underperformed for the past 10-20 years. But it’s now up there among the best. It’s a case of…..watch this space.

  • Doc says:

    Rather than look at the past look at the present. Money means everything now. Go through all the top 5 teams and tell us how many players playing for them came through their academy?

  • AntiOnan says:

    It takes 5-10 years to overhaul a youth academy system from top to bottom (scouts & coaches) and we could be on the verge of finally seeing some results although I expect that it will be over the next 1-3 years at best: Caulkner & Kane.

    The problem is that the north has a more plentiful supply of talent(and always has for some reason) although Arsenal avoided this by going french, But Wilshere is class so there is still some hope for periLondon although I still see no Hoddles, Greaves(yes I know…. Chelsea) or even a Falco when we direly need some.

Comments are closed.