Blogs

Are Liverpool at risk of sacrificing their long-term development?

|
Image for Are Liverpool at risk of sacrificing their long-term development?

When Kenny Dalglish returned to Liverpool midway through last season, the side had a dramatic upturn in fortunes. What was great about this period was that a number of young players were given a chance, and most of them took it and performed outstandingly well; Jay Spearing, Martin Kelly, John Flanagan amongst others, came into the side and did not look out of their depth, and they gained vital first team experience.

Which is why Liverpool’s transfer spending this summer is a worry, where do these players-and those coming up behind them-fit after Liverpool’s big summer spending? Charlie Adam and Stewart Downing will provide much needed strength in depth, but will they keep out players who could have gained vital experience for the future? Will the youngsters who did so well at the back end of last season just be destined for bit-part appearances as substitutions and in the Carling Cup?

There is no pressure on Dalglish, and although every Liverpool fan wants to get back into the Champions League, he could really have used the next season or two, to blood and fully develop the youngsters he already has into a really solid team that could be successful for years to come. One of the best things Rafael Benitez did when at the club-aside from bringing a fifth Champions League title to Merseyside-was put a winning structure in place at the academy. Under the guidance of Jose Segura and Rodolfo Borrell, Liverpool have quickly developed an academy program that is capable of competing with any of the others around the world. The structure is in place, and they have started to produce some really good players, but the importance of giving these players a chance and not always looking to invest in short-term, big money signings, is key.

Under the guidance of director of football Damien Comolli, Liverpool have gone out and spent big on homegrown talent, regardless of the risks that this may pose. Jordan Henderson and Andy Carroll have been bought with a long-term goal in mind, but for £50 odd million for the pair, it is a huge risk to take for the club both on and off the field. Other signings like Charlie Adam and Stewart Downing aren’t getting any younger, but have been brought in to make an immediate impact over the next season, but is this at the expense of the team’s long term future?

It seems as if it is a thin margin, and a difficult balance to achieve. Liverpool are caught between building a squad for the future by developing their academy prospects and the young recruits they have bought, and building a squad to achieve success in the short term, thus sacrificing the long term development of the team.

As long as the up and coming players are given a fair shot and a chance to develop and prove their worth in the first team, alongside the more established names, then I don’t see why Liverpool can’t work towards both short term success and their long term future. The risk is that by continually investing and bringing new players to the club, the talented youngsters who are already there, are forced further down the pecking order and struggle to make the break through to an already over-crowded senior side.

Written by Lauren Rutter for FootballFancast.com. Let me know your thoughts below or follow me on Twitter @LaurenRutter.

ThisisFutbol.com are seeking new writers to join the team! If you’re passionate about football, drop us a line at “thisisfutbol.com@snack-media.com” to learn more.

To have a peak at the top SEVEN available FREE TRANSFERS this summer, click here.

Or have a look at the ten strikers that we think will lead the race for the Golden Boot next season

Share this article

FFC

0 comments

  • magnumopus says:

    It is clear that they were given a chance because of injuries to starters. Kenny would rather play them when he thinks they are ready for first team starters. They are still young and make young gun mistakes and need more strength!

  • Bob Stanton says:

    No – that is my simple answer. First of Henderson and Carroll are 20 and 22 respectively! Yes – they were very expensive thus risks, but theyre age is not compromising the youth! And then Adam and downing – two good strongs players (maybe we have too many CM, but Adam is still useful). You cannot rely on youngsters. You need older players with more experience. If we were to do as you say, focussing on the youngsters, we would jeopardise the next season or two. Kenny Dalglish is very keen on his young english talent, so he would jump at any opportunity to put the youngsters on the pitch, so they would gain some match experience and he will play our more experienced players to gain success in the “short term”, which looking at most players ages in the team would still be quite long, ie. 5 years!

  • Chunky says:

    You can see the next progressive step to this – They will leave.It is already beginning to happen as sales and unrest occur.

Comments are closed.