Blogs

How failing to invest in their future could cost Chelsea:

|

Josh McEachran is held in high regard around Stamford Bridge and looks to have a bright future in front of him, but his first-team chances look to be limited already this term by the arrivals of Juan Mata and Raul Meireles. Daniel Sturridge and Ryan Bertrand do offer a glimmer of hope to a future not revolving entirely around Roman’s roubles, but it’s clutching at straws, with only Sturridge really in contention for a regular first-team berth.

The club simply abandoned any perspective or proposed long-term project they apparently had on the go back in January last year when the club purchased both Fernando Torres and David Luiz for upwards of £70m.

Almost overnight, the club strayed from the pulpit of self-sufficiency which they had been preaching to all and sundry for two seasons and contradicted their earlier summer transfer business of releasing experienced pros such as Michael Ballack, Deco, Joe Cole and Belletti in favour of promoting and integrating their youth-team squad into the first-team.

The reason for this – Chelsea had fallen behind by 10 point to Man Utd. Self-sufficiency went out of the window and with it, the experiment in promoting youth. The cheque-book was open once more, and once it’s been opened, it’s proven extremely difficult to close in the past.

Chelsea’s Chairman Bruce Buck had this to say on what the future holds: “We have to up our sponsorship income, there’s no doubt about it, and up our match-day revenues, reduce our transfer fees a bit, reduce our payroll a bit. I’m not saying the job we face is easy, it’s difficult, but we have to do it. Naming rights could be an important component. We always were of the view that we couldn’t rely on Mr Abramovich forever, it just wasn’t appropriate. We had to figure out a way over the medium term to stand on our own two feet and maybe Financial Fair Play is making us do that a little bit quicker than we might have done otherwise.”

Chelsea’s failure on the pitch could cost them dear in the future and in-turn affect the fans on the terraces with inflated costs. The club’s reluctance to integrate youth-team players, with the FFP rules coming into effect in July 2014, could haunt them long into the future. The club’s current rebuilding project looks to be going reasonably well, despite being in it’s relative infancy under the stewardship of Andre Villas-Boas. The success of the loan spells of players such as Patrick Van Aanholt, Jeffrey Bruma and Gale Kakuta has now taken on even greater importance.

Roman Abramovich’s apparent obsession with the now and a refusal to plan ahead for the future is in direct contrast to Arsene Wenger’s plan at Arsenal. Neglecting a crucial component of any well-run football club – the academy – could see Chelsea have either an unbalanced and bloated squad or one low on the necessary quality in the future as the FFP rules begin to bite. It is little more than rank mis-management among the higher echelons of the club.

Abramovich continues to loom large over the club and while his finances represent Chelsea‘s biggest strength, his refusal to place any faith in a long-term strategy could yet prove to be their greatest weakness.

Written by James McManus for FootballFancast.com. You can follow me on Twitter @JamesMcManus1

Introducing the neat little app that’ll pay you to view content tailored to your interests:

ThisisFutbol.com are seeking new writers to join the team! If you’re passionate about football, drop us a line at “thisisfutbol.com@snack-media.com” to learn more.

Share this article

FFC