Do clubs like Liverpool and Manchester United need to make a return to Youth?

Image for Do clubs like Liverpool and Manchester United need to make a return to Youth?

On Saturday 19 August 1995 Manchester United fielded a group of youngsters in their opening day defeat to Aston Villa, prompting an onslaught from Match of the Day pundit Alan Hansen which is now seen as one of the biggest punditry bloopers of all time. “You’ll never win anything with kids” said Hansen, condemning Sir Alex Ferguson’s decision to play five 20 year-olds and one 18 year-old. Famously, Hansen was proved wrong as ‘Fergie’s Fledglings’, including players such as Paul Scholes, Gary Neville and David Beckham went on to conquer England for the next decade. Ferguson demonstrated remarkable faith and trust in the ‘Class of 92’ but it seems that such trust in youth is no longer common in the Premier League. Over recent seasons, managers have become increasingly reluctant to play the products of their academies, instead choosing to buy from abroad or force existing first-teamers into different positions. With the Financial Fair Play rules on the horizon and the disappointing performances of English teams in the Champions League, maybe it is time the top English sides looked towards their youth prospects again.

Obviously, ‘Fergie’s Fledglings’ are a remarkable exception and it is unlikely that a group of such colossally talented youngsters will ever be assembled again. However, this is not to say that it is not worth a Premier League Manager’s while to throw a young prospect into the action in times of need. In the past season, we have seen remarkably few of the top clubs using a youth product in first team games on a regular basis. In fact, this year has seen the regression of many successful youngsters from previous seasons. Players such as Marc Albrighton have taken backwards steps this year following the purchase of Charles N’Zogbia and Daniel Sturridge has gradually featured less and less for Chelsea, despite his early-season success.

Perhaps one of the biggest examples of this reluctance to field youngsters can be seen at Liverpool. Despite Kenny Dalglish starting Jon Flanagan in the opening day draw at home to Sunderland, he didn’t feature again in the league until 24 March. Whilst his performances were far from perfect, perfection cannot realistically be demanded from a player of his age and experience and this measly appearance record is even stranger when you consider that both the other right-backs Martin Kelly and Glen Johnson were injured for long stages in the season. Dalglish ignored the promising Flanagan and opted for Jamie Carragher at right-back in this situation, in spite of his age and the fact that he is clearly on the downward slope in terms of form and fitness. Dalglish was also reluctant to play Raheem Sterling this year, even though he was showing exceptional form in the Reserves and fans were for clamouring for his inclusion.

Both the Manchester clubs are guilty of this, too. Look at Ferguson, previously so willing to use his youth products in the big games. In 2011/12, however, he was so determined to not give either Paul Pogba or Ravel Morrison an opportunity that he convinced Paul Scholes to come out of retirement. Similarly, Mancini decided that instead of including Nedum Onuoha in his squad after his successful loan at Sunderland, he would spend £6 million on Stefan Savic – whose season can surely be regarded as a failure. There are other examples, Chelsea ignoring then loaning Josh McEachran out and  Arsenal signing Andre Santos despite Kieron Gibbs’ excellent form over previous seasons (although, injury to Santos meant Gibbs played a fair amount, but this was surely unintended) are but two of a long list.

Admittedly, the stakes are higher than ever for Premier League managers – one poor game could be all it takes for a chairman to fire him and this has undoubtedly played a big part in the conservatism of the top managers, but it would be great to see more faith placed in the young talents across the country.  Not only would seeing a local lad fighting for their teams help fans reconnect with their clubs, it would certainly help the national team in the long-term.

Introducing the neat little app that’ll pay you to view content tailored to your interests: are seeking new writers to join the team! If you’re passionate about football, drop us a line at “” to learn more.

Share this article


  • chunky says:

    It was very obvious that Dalglish had very little understanding of exactly how to introduce youth into any of his teams. Whether it be football or any other pursuit a requirement for success of any such introduction is a well thought out systematic plan of continuous action . It is not simply to give a youth a game here and a game there but to have a progression of planned actions with well thought out means to accomplish full team integration . It is hopefully a strong side to BR’s expertise as we can only wait and see . If sound progress of the youths of the Academy cannot be achieved then it throws into doubt any value of having the said Academy in the first place. I think that now those who run the Academy share a common belief in how our game should progress. At least that is what I fervently hope – smile!

    • Sam Dean says:

      I totally agree, but I think at times it’s not all about thorough, ‘systematic’ and ‘continuous’ progress in terms of the production of players. The vast majority of youth team players are not going to make it in the first-team, barring the kind of exception seen at United in ’95 and Barcelona in recent years. It is unrealistic to expect each club, especially a club like Liverpool which has to fight off competition from other local clubs for every promising youngster, to produce successful youth team graduates at a high rate – even if the Academy was as effective as you hope for. This means that when a youngster with potential is looking good enough to make the jump, like Sterling, he should be given first-team opportunities or the club is going to lose him. It was such a shame that Dalglish didn’t have the guts to do that.

  • Jon Elliott says:

    Interesting article. I expect the answer is that there is more riding on football than 20 years ago when the Man U youngsters played at Villa. They also had world class senior players all around them who knew how to win. Flannagan is not a brilliant player, Craig Bellamy intermated recently that Sterling needs to knuckle down in training if he wants to reach the very top. I suspect youngsters these days dont have the attitude of Nevilles, Scholes, Becks etc. Didnt Morrison have a run in with the plod? And Pogba has an agent who has turned him. Football and footballers have changed. The best place for these players is the lower leagues, not the premiership. They should join your likes of Crews who have a track record of bringing young players on.

  • Bogside says:

    What a terrible, poorly written article. I suspect a fifteen year old with a only a brief knowledge of football would be able to produce this rubbish. No insight, weak facts, poor analysis.

    • Sam Dean says:

      What exactly makes this poorly written? Where are the supposed ‘weak facts’? I’d appreciate your criticism more if you provided some examples. And also, where have I actually gone wrong here? What is incorrect about this article? Finally, I apologise for the article. I really hope my next one will be up to your standard

  • Ronny says:

    Everybody are talking about how fantastic Dalglish was as manager when he took over from Joe Fagan.Nobody are talking about the fantastic team that already was in place.The big difference between the first and second spell was that in 85 he just had to paint some rooms and in 2011 he had to build a new house.Kenny failed as a team builder.This bullshit about Dalglish as a fantastic manager doesn’t make sense.

Comments are closed.