Blogs

Is Gareth Bale really so much better than the likes of Theo Walcott?

|

Provocative though the title of this article is, I’d like to think that it could generate some sensible discussion. Most non-Spurs fans are by now willing to accept that Gareth Bale has been hugely overrated this season and that he was undeserving of receiving the PFA Player of the Year award for his contributions in the Premier League. Whilst I understand the right of fans to protect and defend their players, I can’t help but feel that as every game goes by, Gareth Bale is beginning to be more and more ‘found out’.

That’s not to say I don’t think he’s a good player – maybe even a fantastic player, but he scarcely merits the kind of foamy-mouthed, blind-adulation that the Press have thrown in his direction. After his two performances against Inter Milan, Bale has very much become a victim of his own hype. So high was his stature at about the mid-point of the season that it’s not surprising that he has disappointed on a number of occasions since. You simply can’t perform at that high a level week-in and week-out, unless you are a Lionel Messi or a Cristiano Ronaldo and despite what a small pocket of Tottenham fans would have you believe, Bale simply isn’t at that level.

I was particularly disappointed with his recent performances against big opposition Arsenal (20th April) and Chelsea (last night). My foremost memory of Bale’s performance against Arsenal was his being poleaxed by Wojiech Szczesny; otherwise the Welshman added very little to a sizzling North London Derby. His performance against Chelsea was even more negligible. Bale all too often gave the ball away in dangerous positions and failed to provide any ammunition for Spur’s ailing strikers. I counted three crosses from the 21-year-old, two of which were wildly over-hit, the third of which was blocked. Chelsea’s Ivanovic stayed closed to Bale for most of the game and rendered him pretty much ineffective.

I hope that these recent performers put to bed a couple of myths that surround Bale’s legend. First, the myth that Bale comes to life in the big games. Barring his performances against Inter Milan and Arsenal (earlier in the season at the Emirates) he hasn’t really stood out against any of the big teams.

Secondly I’ve seen numerous fans defend Bale’s poor assist rate (1 assist in the Premier League all season) on the basis that Spur’s strikers simply aren’t good enough. But on the basis of Bale’s deliveries against Chelsea it’s clear why he hasn’t racked up a plethora of assists: it’s an area of his game that needs more work.

I know Gareth Bale’s season has been interrupted by injuries, but that excuse will only stand up for so long. Theo Walcott is another player who has had his season blighted by injury. Yet whenever Walcott makes a return for Arsenal he looks vital, alive and dangerous – something that’s not always the case with Bale. As a result Walcott has registered much better stats this season than Bale, both in terms of goals and assists, but there’s more to football than statistics right?

In that regard, I’d argue that Walcott offers more to Arsenal than Bale offers to Spurs. When Bale’s closely marked, he often disappears out of the game, failing even to drag the opposition defence about a bit and create room for Tottenham’s strikers. Walcott on the other hand, always seems capable of making runs inside centre-backs, even when he’s closely shadowed. His crossing has improved drastically this season, he’s got as much, if not more pace than Bale and he uses the ball better.

I’m sure that Tottenham fans will favour Bale and Arsenal fans will favour Walcott, but I do believe there’s a decent debate to be had about the two player’s relative merits. They both have big futures ahead of them but it’s my opinion that Walcott will end up leaving a bigger mark on world football.

Follow @ThePerfectPass on Twitter for details on all the latest updates and various football-related musings.

ThisisFutbol.com are seeking new writers to join the team! If you’re passionate about football, drop us a line at “thisisfutbol.com@snack-media.com” to learn more.

To have a peak at the top SEVEN available FREE TRANSFERS this summer, click here.

[bet_365 type=’generic’ size=’468′ af_code=’365_061437′]

Share this article

FFC

0 comments

  • Tom says:

    Hahahah is this a joke or are you merely trying to get click’s ? Walcott better than Gareth bale -seriously dont even go there. Funniest thing i’ve seen since rabies in a guide dogs home.

  • Uvzz Assou-Ekotto says:

    From a spurs fans point of view, i agree with pretty much everything uv written.

    I used to love taking the piss out of walcott, but i have given up on this a while ago because of the reasons you have mentioned.

    Its quite true how Bale has been “found out” and its been frustrating watching him play in 2011. His 2 performances against Inter are best countered by his 2 performances against Everton thanks mainly to Phil Neville (is he also worth 80million then?)

    This has been Bale’s first FULL season in the league, which has been a disapointment in contrast to his champions league form. But im confident he will work on his flaws in pre-season and come back next season a much better player.

    Who will leave a bigger mark on the world? We will see. But i hope u dont think im being biased by saying that, to date, Bales mark on the world is currently larger than Walcotts

  • toye says:

    Bale’s myth is a creation of the reckless and deceitful press.They are the reason why England might never win anything major tourney again in the world of football.

  • JOHN DUCKETT says:

    AS A SPURS SUPPORTER I MUST ADMIT THAT BALE HAS BEEN AWFUL SINCE HIS MILAN AND EUROPE LEAGUE THE GUY IS PRETTY MUCH AVERAGE INFACT BRING BENTLEY BACK WHO I THINK WAS A VERY BAD PLAYER FROM THE £15,000,000 TRANSFER FROM B`BURN .

  • john says:

    bale is a better player becuase his got a better shot and cross on him than walcott but i do think he is way overrated.

  • tott says:

    Spot on bale is pants but he does look like a frigging brilliant chimp we need him to show us more monkey magic haha

  • ade says:

    gareth baleis another georde best.

  • mikeyg says:

    It’s funny how people just say Bale is better without being able to put any evidence forward.

    For the 2010-11 season Walcott was way ahead of Bale on most stats such as goals, assists, chances created, pass completion but Bale was somehow POFY.

    In fact Gareth Bale didn’t even come in the top 20 wide players in the Premier League last season.

    In terms of goals and assists, overall, Nani came out top, with Ashley Young 2nd and Malouda 3rd. Walcott was the 6th best wide player and Gareth Bale came 26th.

    If we take into account the number of games each player played Nani was still top, effective in 84% of games, Walcott came 2nd here being effective in 64% of Premier League games. Gareth Bale on the otherhand was way down in 28% effective in only 28% of games.

Comments are closed.